Global or National Race Discussion?

Racism is a global phenome. Since the 1400s when Europeans began exploration - wherever they settled the construct of racism was instituted to oppress and control the indigenous populations.

Now that conversations such as reparations and land back are in the forefront (again), should accountability be held on a global level or confined to nations to be beholden to those they oppressed solely in their country?

Stewardship and Racism

As land in the US (i.e. Turtle Island) has been occupied as early as the 1400 to 1500s - land distribution and usage has been controlled by Europeans (i.e. white citizens of the US). The Climate Crisis and pollution continues to rise exponentially despite the awareness and warnings of the planet being in a state of exponential danger and irreversible damage. There are climate groups, organizations and activists challenging the system and initiating repair as best as they can - YET - most of these entities refuse to include the Indigenous at the table on how to heal the land and or protect it. The Indigenous know the land the best, as well as the techniques and/or methods that need to be applied for planet/land regeneration. They have been here since Time Immemorial…

Are we as a nation willing to admit how racism plays a crucial role in why white led groups and organizations will not partner with Indigenous tribes, organizations and/or activists - or better yet - let them take the lead on land healing and repairs?

Executive Order: Change the Name Back (A football team's saga)?

The President of the United States is threatening to “restrict a stadium deal” if the Washington Commanders keep refusing to change their name back to the “R” word. This term is a racial slur against the Indigenous (Native Americans) in the US. Should executive power be able to use the power of the purse to influence the outcome of a business deal taking place in the institution of professional sports?

What happens after they are gone?

How do we as a nation have “that future conversation” with our living descendants that ‘we allowed’ citizens and non-citizens to be deported due to policies created to target them legally due to biased racial “stereotypes” and beliefs?

The Battle over DEI

Since 2023 there has been this aggressive movement to dismantle DEI within US institutions. The aggression being displayed intentionally at education; from banning of books, creating policies to federally defund schools over DEI, to states to suppressing student protests on campuses and other moves, such as, getting rid of AP courses on ethnic studies.

Is the battle of DEI a necessary measure to sustain the peace in the US? Or could this action begin the fall of the union?

Companies and Organizations breaking DEI promises

Zoom and the University of Florida (following Desantis’ move to banning DEI) are amongst a list of notable institutions pulling their DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion) programs. Many facilities breaking their 2020 promises to intentionally address racism despite recognizing the need amidst a racial crisis taking place in the US. Zoom laid off a significant portion of their staff while UF completely got ride of theirs.

What are your thoughts on this issue? Do you feel their decisions are warranted or are they just delaying the inevitable?